Introduction: We began last week to consider a trilogy of psalms that deal with the OT “Doctrine of Retribution,” and again, Derek Kidner’s commentary on psalms has been a great help in this study.
Last week, in Psalm 34, we saw the doctrine flatly stated
Next week, in Psalm 73, we will see the psalmist himself as the sufferer, challenged to take comfort in these powerful truths.
This week, we see Psalm 37, and it has a very different tone than Psalm 34 did. Here, the psalmist is not stating facts, he is answering questions. He will affirm the doctrine, but from the more personal perspective of giving third-party instruction to a person who, though righteous, is suffering.
The words of a counselor to a person in pain are often poignant, and so it is here as well. In a sense, he is explaining how the third Beatitude works (“the meek shall inherit”), when it doesn’t seem to work here. Again, his goal is to wrestle with the question, “Why do the righteous suffer, when the wicked seem to prosper?”
Structure- Three issues of structure are worth noting…
I. Declaration of the Doctrine of Retribution (v.6)
The basic concept of the doctrine is summarized in v.6, but is found in its fullness in v.9. Notice…
It is also found in the book of Proverbs in two key passages…
Notice that Proverbs 24:19 is almost a verbatim repetition of Psalm 37:1. As we saw last week, this doctrine (law) of retribution was one of the basic tenets of Jewish thought and OT teaching—expressing the confidence of the Jewish people in the ultimate justice of God being expressed.
We’ll pick up here tomorrow…